
Having formerly trained people for job interviews, and having even endured a couple of less-than-stellar performances myself, it was nice to be on the other side of the interview table today, slinging questions like a barkeep slings foamy beverages. After enduring -- and yes, I have chosen that word very carefully -- a couple of the applicants, though, I could have used one of said beverages. Or two. I grant you that job interviews can be about as pleasant as having your toenails surgically removed, but having people come in when they're either unprepared, unlistening or generally oblivious is like having the entire toe gnawed off by a rabid beaver. While perhaps not dim bulbs, a couple were certainly not luminaries. Watt the heck? It was as though they could have used reading
Interviews for Dummies, rather than their own books:
Interviews BY Dummies.

So, being car-less (not to be confused with being Carlos, Carla or Carlee) myself, I again found myself at the car rental place bright and early this morning. A recurring theme of late. A Chrysler. A wannabe Chevy Cobalt (oh, a wee yearning for Kobe the Cobalt, which carried me to Alabama!). But no automatic locks. Not even cruise control. And they said there was a quarter of a tank of gas. But really, there was only an eighth and I was in too much of hurry to notice until I ran low in Woodstock. Grr. At least there was a CD player. A poor man's Cobalt, I'd say. I didn't know they even still made cars without such features standard. It wasn't even a Ford. What is this, the Fred Flintstone car? Yabba Dabba Don't.
Off to Steeltown: Hamilton, ON. And a ride down the escarpment -- hey, more fall leaves! Anyway, the interviews were interesting, and even resulted in a couple of good candidates. That said, there were also a couple of cringe-worthy moments. One potential candidate not only arrived ten minutes late, he offered no explanation or apology for having done so. "
The dog ate my watch" would have got him the job. Or not. Then, given an out at the end of the interview when asked if he had run into traffic, he simply replied, "
No. I just missed my exit." Pre-plan and do a drive-by (no, not that kind of drive-by) beforehand, kids. No remorse. Not that I would advocate lying, but this just might be a time to creatively bend the truth like Gumby. At least take the out provided. Really, is a job interview the time you really want to advertise that you're disorganized? Well, he did look a little like he could be a made-man in a local disorganized-crime family.
He was already treading in a murky pool of skepticism as it was since his resume was punctuated with spelling errors and oversights resulting from poor copy-and-paste skills. Mmm, fond memories of kindergarten: UHU sticks and safety scissors. The landscape of his work history, planted with duplicated and misplaced words. Weeds. Spread over a two-and-a-half page cover letter. Succinct? Um, no. Ah, and I haven't yet even informed you this was for a communications job where editing and precision are key (not to mention touted skills, misspelled in his resume). He didn't even put the position's correct title into his cover letter (it had been all the way down in the third line of the job advertisement, after all). No, instead, he chose to include the abbreviations for each of the seven words in the title (including repeating 'Office' and its abbrev., "Off."). Proofread, people. Puh-lease.
The position reports to a project run by four universities (and involves another three). One candidate "only had time to review one" of the universities' sites. Another pointed out that he had been taught how to use Microsoft Excel by a colleague, but "
I forgot it after 2-3 days, and read the manuals to learn some of it again -- it can be used to make colour graphs and things." Um, thanks? You go-getter, you. Get 'em tiger. When asking about knowledge of university research successes, we were provided with a great example. About a competitor not involved in the consortium. What? Remember, there are seven -- count 'em, seven -- main institutions from which he could have provided an example without offending any sensibilities. Seven. Nope, let's go with the competitor because it's easier. Well, I guess the media often seems to work that way, too.

Don't be too beancounter-like. Another thing: don't confuse "lead" with "led". Saying, "
Of course, they liked me so much they signed me on full-time," "
Gosh, there's been so many examples of my learning quickly" or "I
was the maestro," might be true. But they might also just smack of being a tad too boastful. Not suggested. Not wise. It's a fine line that exists between your tooting your own horn and sounding like a flatulent elephant. Show some humility, folks. "I
was fortunate that my skills were recognized as providing value and they signed me on full-time," maybe? And when we ask about new skills you've had to adopt, you might not really want bring up the time you tried to install cedar floorboards and had to spend an hour-and-a-half in the hospital with wood in your eye. Unless it resulted in your teaching yourself eye surgery while on the stretcher. And please do your homework. The Internet is an amazing tool if you know how to use it critically. It's full of, like, information and stuff, you know? First and foremost, though: listen and answer the questions you are asked. Just a suggestion: answer them and be quiet before you end up using your oversized feet as the sandwich filling between your lips. If we want more, we'll ask. One interviewee took 25 minutes to regurgitate his resume (and it wasn't that tasty), rather than answer the question: "
Tell us a little bit about yourself and why you are interested in this job". Oddly, I still haven't heard an answer as to why he wanted to work with us (and that's a pretty basic -- not to mention common -- first question in an interview). But I could tell you plenty about a former job he seemed to pine over like a lost, jilted lover.
Be yourself. Unless you happen to be a sociopath. Or the fourth guy we saw today. Be honest. And remember that we're just people, too, and we're (really) not there to give you the gears. Again, really. We just want to find a good fit and can see through the nervousness to the essential you. If you let us. Is it you? Great -- help us see it so that we can get on our way, pay you lots of money and stop wondering why people still don't proofread.
Nonetheless, I was quite happy to be a part of the hiring process for a new colleague. Who will make more money than me. Despite falling lower on the food chain. No jealousy, there. Really. Actually, the chosen candidate (insert appropriate theme song here) reminded me a lot of, well, me. And I mean that in a good way. Congratulations -- I look forward to working with you and helping you navigate the miasma. Oh, we didn't mention that? Whoops. My bad.
275kms and far less patience.
Exchange of the (long) day, though:
INTERVIEWEE: "Oh, so you don't have the financial resources to hire a consultant to help me with the communications strategy?" (Which we would be hired to develop.)
ME: "YOU would be the consultant." (Actually, there's not a hope you'll be hired anyway, so don't worry about it, fool.)
COLLEAGUE: "You'd be the consultant -- that's why it's good to talk to yourself." Muttering, "You know, that OTHER voice in your head." (A little harsh, yes, but it still flew right past him.)
Throwback road music: 
Fugazi:
Steady Diet of Nothing;

REM:
Up;

The Joel Plaskett Emergency:
Truthfully, Truthfully;

Pearl Jam:
Yield;

Elastica:
S/T;

Liz Phair:
S/T